Benedict … Arnold?
Benedict Arnold is famous in US History for originally fighting
for the American Continental Army but defecting later to the British Army. Pope Benedict’s announcement of his “retirement”
puts him squarely in line with flip flopping.
Worse still has been the media – and the public’s seeming acceptance of
the publicist driven story from the Vatican.
Pope John Paul II and John Ratzinger, his loyal lieutenant
whose role was to enforce Catholic dogma – rewrote the rules and procedures for
selecting future popes. These new rules,
had they been in place in 1979 would have never allowed John Paul II to
ascend. These rules permitted the
enforcer to become the next Pope. To
claim that Ratzinger never wanted to be Pope is simply inconsistent with the
reporting at the time that had plenty of coverage of the backstage maneuvering
that allowed the unpopular Ratzinger to become Pope. Why the same correspondents can’t even
recall, let alone refer to their own reporting is further evidence of the
decline of serious journalism.
I do not agree with many of the dogmatic interpretations
that the Catholic Church has on issues of women and sexuality. (My preferred liturgical tradition is
Anglo-Catholic and I attend services weekly, so I’m not anti-religion or
anti-Catholic.) The Catholic Church’s
participation and handling of the various scandals has been nothing less than
appalling. The sexual abuse issues predate
the current Pope and while he’s made a number of efforts towards
reconciliation, it’s been woefully inadequate.
Pope Benedict is one of the foremost experts in the world on
that interpretation and the consistency with which the Catholic Church should
apply them. It’s not like a Democratic
or Republic convention where people get to vote on various social issues – the
positions the Church take have a long history.
Others far more adept on this issue than I can (and do) argue
effectively about how those positions should change and are supported theologically.
A fundamental value – and indeed a core principal of the
Catholic Church is that there is one Pope through which God works (and he’s infallible). It’s a lifetime gig. You’re called by God and you serve until He
takes you away. Popes can be traced back
through time to the Apostles – it is one of the most sacred and important rites
that the Church has. You don’t just walk away from it because you’re
tired. And you certainly don’t just walk
away from it if you’ve spent your entire life trying to convince the flock to
stay true to the core principals of the Church.
The spin-meisters say that the resignation proves
strength…when in fact it shows deep and troubling hypocrisy. The media coverage has taken the ‘reason’ for
the resignation at face value. This was
a man who was supposed to be a transitional figure – between his friend John Paul
II and the next generation. When John Paul II was dying of Parkinson’s – the
world waited, watched and prayed for years.
All of a sudden the Pope can’t serve?
The truth lies somewhere between a Dan Brown novel of
Vatican intrigue and the publicists spin.
I’m confident the next Pope will not change dogma – but will be more
media savvy and a better fiscal manager.
This fundamental betrayal of Pope Benedict’s lifelong work is a
faith-challenging turn of events. My own
faith in the media’s ability to take information and decipher it rather than
regurgitate it diminishes even faster.
Insightful and thought provoking...
ReplyDelete