Profiling Justice
I enjoy people watching.
I’ll make up an entire back story about somebody based totally on how
they look, walk, interact with others.
Then they’ll do something that is ‘out-of-character’ with the person
I’ve made up and I’ll revise their entire history. It’s an amusing and harmless way to while
away time. Perhaps I’m wistful for my
days working in entertainment, or perhaps I’m a profiler. And if I’m a profiler – then it’s a good
thing I live in a state with a stand your ground law – I can be a total help to
law enforcement.
The Castle Doctrine permits somebody to use deadly force in protecting their
‘castle.’ There’s a unique variation on
each of the states that it’s on the books for – but the essential philosophy is
an extension of the mountain of constitutional self-defense law.
The principle now extends to one’s
personal space, not just possessions.
These sorts of laws are quite popular – with property-owning
constituents and their elected representatives.
In fact, then State Senator Barak Obama co-sponsored legislation in
Illinois
that strengthened their stand-your-ground bill that passed unanimously with no
debate.
The acquittal of George Zimmerman erupted a tsunami of outrage across the
political spectrum. Now President Obama took
to the White House podium for an unscheduled 20-minute monologue. He took the opportunity to speak personally
about race which is very helpful for our nation’s discourse. In his way, though, he was expressing support
for those who were upset at the acquittal.
The chant has been “Justice for Trayvon” – the young man who Zimmerman
shot.
While I did not follow the ins and outs of the
sensationalized trial, from what I understand a trial was held. A jury was chosen. The judge largely ruled against defense
motions – as most judges do. The
prosecution had the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that Zimmerman
intended to kill Martin. The jury was
sequestered from the hyperventilating coverage.
(This trial was so important that CNN chose to cover it instead of the
overthrow of the Egyptian President.) The
jurors deliberated and came to a unanimous conclusion. That is how the U.S. justice system is
designed to work. So by pure definition Trayvon
got justice. Zimmerman did not get
punished…and that’s the missing ingredient that has people upset. The chant should be “Punish Zimmerman.”
The American judicial system is a collection of arcane rules
of evidence and strict procedures. The
jury has to be “instructed” on how to deliberate. Watching from the comfort of our homes and
accustomed to Law & Order style justice – most people consider everything
when making a determination about somebody’s guilt or innocence. The justice system doesn’t actually work that
way – it’s very exclusive about what it allows.
Its fundamental principal is “innocent until proven guilty.”
The prosecutions job is hard – because it’s supposed to
be. English jurist William Blackstone
set the standard in the 1760’s when he said:
"It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent
suffer."
The principle still applies to state crimes like murder that
are governed by state legislatures and state laws, like the ones Mr. Obama
supported and co-sponsored when he was a state legislator. The principle is less secure at the federal
level where an entirely separate and secret justice system has been
established. Secret courts make secret
rulings. President Obama has his own
Kill list of people who he personally chooses should die based on his own
secret criteria. People (including
Americans) who haven’t been accused of, tried or convicted of any crime are
killed on the say so of one person.
Where’s the cry for justice in these instances?
The taking of another human life is the most heinous crime
against society that we have. That somebody
could do that and be found “not guilty” shows that the system works as William
Blackstone intended but doesn’t help the emotional desire for revenge. It also shows that Mr. Obama is actually
using the same standard as President as he used as a State Senator…standing his
ground to defend what he has determined needs protecting.
Comments
Post a Comment