e-dubious
I’m the anti-hoarder. There are not a lot of physical things
that I’ve held on to. Earlier this year, in fact, I purged nearly two-thirds of
my belongings that I had in storage. Live without stuff for three
or four years and all of a sudden it’s really clear about what you want to keep
and what you don’t! When it comes to my digital life, however, I’m the
opposite. I have every email I’ve ever written or received (sans junk) since
1996. They’re filed by subject, by year – and I go so far as to make sure that
every time there’s a major upgrade to Outlook that the old emails are readable.
I guess this means I will never hold public office.
Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and presumptive
Democratic Presidential nominee for 2016 has been under fire for not just using
a private email account and server – but for taking weeks to speak publicly
about why. (And when she finally did she did so from the United Nations - choosing to address the issue on land that technically isn't in the U.S.?!?) President Obama claims he learned of Mrs. Clinton's practice “when everybody
else did.” The President of the United States never emailed with
his Secretary of State? There are reports that he corresponded with the Secretary of State and it makes sense that he
would. I would hope that the Commander in Chief and the country's chief diplomat would actually be in regular dialogue, which today would include email. I certainly look at the “from” line on emails I receive – and while the reason
I do so is to see the name it’s natural that you just note the account,
especially when you correspond with somebody regularly. It’s rather difficult
to believe that not one person in the Executive Branch or the State Department
knew that Mrs. Clinton wasn’t using a government sanctioned account. Nobody saw
it wasn’t a .gov address?
Secretary Clinton did call on the State Department to
release the emails – after they are scrubbed and checked. It’s an interesting
tactic since the emails were on a personal server and not government, so she
could just release them herself. From a diplomatic perspective everything shouldn't be released, but from a political point of view they should. Secretary Clinton has now advocated both the release of information and the screening of that same information. Sounds and feels an awful lot like the Nixon
White House reviewing the tapes before letting anybody hear them. Matt Taibbi
of Rolling Stone has a biting story on the likeness of Hillary Clinton to Richard Nixon. POTUS Radio had a
devastating compilation of sound bites inter-spliced together of Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Nixon – both
speaking about how THEY would determine what was appropriate for the public to
hear. After Watergate the country demanded openness.
This week (3/16/15) is the 10th Anniversary of
Sunshine Week - a national initiative spearheaded by
the American Society of News Editors to educate the public about the importance
of open government and the dangers of excessive and unnecessary secrecy. To
kick off the week the White House unilaterally removed the Freedom Of
Information Request regulation that had governed the Executive Branch for 30
years. – Now the White House no longer has to comply with any requests from the
press or from the public for information. The decision to eliminate the rule follows six years legal challenges that the
administration pursued – all the while stonewalling and not fulfilling the
requests of the public.
Fear not, the Administration didn’t ignore the spirit of
transparency or let Sunshine Week pass unnoticed. The Department
of Justice held an event (on the same day as the White House announcement)
which awarded President Obama and Attorney General Holder with awards for
fulfilling the campaign promise to have the “most transparent” Presidency in
history. This is not an Onion news
report or a Jon Stewart skewer – it’s the arrogance of an administration that
cares little for openness. No mention was made at the 40-minute ceremony
of the DoJ’s attempt to criminalize journalistic practices and threatening to
jail reporters as enemies of the state for doing their job.
It’s not just a national issue – it’s local too. In
Massachusetts Secretary of State William Galvin has made a practice of keepinginformation secret. Most recently he ruled that the names
of five police officers who were arrested for driving drunk could be kept
secret. To celebrate Sunshine week – in an unprecedented move the three
newspapers that cover greater Boston (The Boston Globe, The Boston Herald and
the Patriot Ledger) all ran their own editorials on the same day condemning Galvin and the lack of access to public records.
In my lifetime the world has shrunk and the quantity of
information available to each of us on a palm sized device has been stunning.
It’s a wide open world that has fueled economic growth, revolutions in distant
lands and a rapid change in social mores and behavior. Government is way behind…will
they catch up and become more open and transparent? I’m e-dubious.
Comments
Post a Comment