Magna Constitution
As I prepare to leave the US for a ten-day international
business trip, I have been thinking about my own Ugly Americanisms. I only
speak one language and while I appreciate other cultures and other ways of
doing this, I do know what I like and how I like it. Writing this blog allows
me to exercise one of my most passionate interests – freedom of expression. The
right to say what I think, no matter how whacked out some may think it is, generally
without fear or concern of consequence. That freedom is thanks to the freedoms
enshrined in the U.S. Constitution that is a direct descendent of the Magna
Carta – which happened to have a birthday this week.
On Monday, June 15, 2015 the Magna Carta turned 800. She doesn’t look a day over 700. According to CNN: “The catalyst for Magna
Carta was the tyrannical rule of King John and, in particular, his imposition
of arbitrary taxes upon the barons. The sealing of Magna Carta marked the first
time that the notion that an unelected sovereign should be restrained under law
was officially recognized. From then on, the idea that citizens should not be
subjected to the arbitrary rule of a tyrannical monarch but instead be ruled
and governed upon foundations of accepted legal process and law had a legal
foundation.”
Throughout history, according to Wikipedia:
“It influenced the early American colonists in the Thirteen Colonies and the
formation of the American Constitution in 1787, which became the supreme law of
the land in the new republic of the United States.”
In a timely analysis, The Fiscal Times wrote: “Mr.
Obama has pursued an ambitious agenda since he entered the White House,
increasingly acting alone.” The article goes on to detail a long list of
examples that the President has acted unilaterally, in conflict with the
Constitution.
Adapting their list to include my own points:
- Maintaining a “kill” list where he alone decides who lives and dies based on information only he has.
- The defunct PATRIOT act reborn as the FREEDOM act that encourages and allows the Government to look into people’s personal lives and activities in the guise of security
- Using the Executive Order to bypass legislative processes
- Military action without consultation with the Congress or authorization
The list can go on and on. There are political realities for
the workarounds. On the anniversary of the document that was created to
restrain unilateral action its worth remembering the President Obama was
elected and the law applies to him. As a former professor of Constitutional
law, it’s an appropriate time to refresh his memory on the source of the
document that frames the country he was elected to serve.
Comments
Post a Comment