Found Money
I found $20 the other day. The bill was folded up and
stuffed in the coin pocket of my jeans. What it was originally intended for is
lost to my middle-aged memory and instead the discovery is a nice happenstance. It’s not
like I lost the money or had a huge lottery win, but instead it was what Dad
used to call “mad money” that can be used for fun
purposes. I think he made that up, but I still like the concept. As I contemplated what
to do with the largess I had squirreled away unintentionally I discovered that
I wasn’t the only one who hides money. The CIA has been planting money in plain
sight in the most terrifying way.
It’s been well reported that in 2009 the CIA gave $1 million al Qaida to free an
Afghan diplomat. Oops…the U.S. was supposed to be fighting against al Qaida.
The Department of Defense lost $8.7 billion of the $9.1 billion intended for infrastructure in rebuilding Iraq
in 2010. Reread those figures. Billions. This is money that was misplaced or pocketed. It disappeared, it's not a deficit. Poof.
So the CIA and its other military brethren don't handle money well. Why should it?
Nobody knows how much the CIA gets to start with. Per Wikipedia: “Details of the overall United States intelligence budget are classified. Under
the Central Intelligence Agency Act of 1949, the Director of Central
Intelligence is the only federal government employee who can spend "un-vouchered"
government money. The government has disclosed a total figure for all
non-military intelligence spending since 2007; the fiscal 2013 figure is $52.6
billion.” With the growth in the budget and the obsession of "security" it's not unreasonable to consider the budget around $75 billion.
That secrecy supports my own image of the CIA that has been
largely formulated from Hollywood. Clandestine. Secretive. And of course cool gizmos for use in the
spy stuff. Wikipedia states “CIA has no law enforcement function and is mainly focused on overseas
intelligence gathering, with only limited domestic collection. CIA is the only
agency authorized by law to carry out and oversee covert action on behalf of
the President.”
Imagine my surprise to discover that the CIA has an active entrepreneurial
side that is firmly based in the U.S. and is heavily invested in technology and other sectors. The CIA has a Venture Capital division. “In-Q-Tel
is the independent, not-for-profit organization created to bridge the gap
between the technology needs of the U.S. Intelligence Community (IC) and
emerging commercial innovation.” So says the company’s public facing website. Independent? Not if its funded by the CIA.
The company is currently invested in 108 different start up
technology companies. They are also invested in cosmetics. Oprah’s magazine, lifestyle
bloggers and skin care professionals love Clearista, a skin product that clears
your face of dirt and other stuff. According to The Intercept: “Skincential Sciences developed a patented technology that removes a thin outer
layer of the skin, revealing unique biomarkers that can be used for a variety
of diagnostic tests, including DNA collection.” Forget having a clean face, the
CIA now owns the technology to gather DNA from every citizen as they wash up.
I randomly selected Video and Imaging to see where they are
invested in that subsector. There are 11 companies. The first one, 3VR is
described: “Searchable surveillance systems and services 3VR, Inc., the video
intelligence company, enables organizations to search, mine, and leverage video
to bolster security, identify and mitigate fraud, and better serve customers.
3VR’s Video Intelligence Platform allows video surveillance systems to reach their
true potential and deliver a measurable and sustainable return on investment by
revealing powerful new insights in the correlation of video with other sources
of enterprise data.”
Translation: The CIA can now mine video data and match it
with other data that the government has collected. What Fourth Amendment? (Guess the CIA is no longer just focused on overseas issues.)
Going through the In-Q-Tel portfolio is
perhaps one of the most upsetting, frustrating and scary things that I’ve done
since I saw a snake in 3-D on a 70 foot screen coming after me.
Maybe there is some strategic security reason for the Central Intelligence Agency to be one of the largest investors in new technology companies. But shouldn’t that be a discussion in Congress? During a debate of those people who seek to be President? Why is it funded from taxpayer money that is not accounted for?
Maybe there is some strategic security reason for the Central Intelligence Agency to be one of the largest investors in new technology companies. But shouldn’t that be a discussion in Congress? During a debate of those people who seek to be President? Why is it funded from taxpayer money that is not accounted for?
What’s most egregious and unfathomable is that while the
investments are open and transparent and the technology that the government is
creating available for all to see – the financial impact to the taxpayer is
hidden. It’s not found money – it’s American taxpayer funds and they deserve to
be accounted for.
Comments
Post a Comment