A New York State of Mind

London has the world’s attention this week, not New York, thanks to the Olympics which chose the British capital over NYC as host city.  The gold medal for chutzpah, however, goes to Mayor Michael Bloomberg.  He already holds the award for self-financing a campaign ($108 million) against an opponent who spent less than one-tenth the dollars and came within 4.5 points of beating him.  The mayor’s penchant for dictating what New Yorkers can consume made headlines again this week.

The billionaire businessman turned politician first had New York City restaurants ban the use of trans fats in 2006.  The mayor’s next proposal this past May would ban large sodas from being sold in the Big Apple. This week the mayor suggested that hospitals stop feeding baby formula to newborns as a way to encourage breast feeding.  From a health and medical perspective having fewer trans fats, consuming less sugary soda and having babies breast fed is probably the healthier alternative.  Having the Government decide these choices, however, is something else again.
It was surprising, then, to find the nation’s nanny-mayor not jumping on the anti-Chick-Fil-A brigade like majors in Boston, Chicago, Philadelphia and San Francisco (amongst others).
“You can’t have a test for what the owners’ personal views are before you decide to give a permit to do something in the city. You really don’t want to ask political beliefs or religious beliefs before you issue a permit. That’s just not government’s job.”  Refreshing comments from Mayor Bloomberg – the same guy who does have government tell people what to eat.  That’s chutzpah New York style.  
The Cathy Family owns the chicken chain and caused a stir when Dan Cathy said: “Well, guilty as charged," in an interview when asked about Chick-fil-A’s opposing gay marriage. Twitter and Facebook ignited in a furor with boycotts on the one side and celebrations on the other. Yesterday was “appreciation day” where throngs of people went to the fast food chain to show their support.  This occurred in largely in response to big city mayors saying the company wasn’t welcome in their towns.
The U.S. economy is structured around supply and demand.  Businesses must operate under a variety of regulations (work practices, industry specific rules, etc.).  Freedom of speech is a cherished right and principal.  The Supreme Court ruled in 2010 that corporations/not-for-profit organizations/unions, etc. could participate financially in the electoral process.  Mitt Romney summarized that decision in his infamous quote:  “corporations are people.”  Well, not quite.

Business owners have the right to express their viewpoints.  They have the right to take their money and give it to causes that support their opinions.  Customers have the right to protest, object and boycott businesses.  It’s this tension why most businesses steer clear of controversial issues and focus on supplying their customers need.  Efforts can be undertaken to change the opinion: protests, shame ... even blogging.  Government and politicians can (and should) rail against short-sighted and ill-informed comments.  Government, however, doesn’t have the right to regulate a business based on what it says, only on what it does. 

A cake shop in Denver two weeks ago refused to make a gay couple a rainbow-layered wedding cake.  That action is not only bad business, but is an action that deserves government intervention.  It’s fine for the owners of the cake shop to oppose gay marriage, misguided as I think that may be.  Refusing service based on those beliefs is discrimination and not permissible.  That is the distinction on where Government actually has a role.

Banning or even threatening to ban a business for its thought/opinion is a slippery slope. If some areas bans a business for what they say about opposing gay marriage, it’s not inconceivable that other areas would ban businesses for supporting gay marriage – or any other topic. And where would we be then?  New York - where chef's might as well go to the Bloomberg school of nutrition. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Give me a break!

The idiom “give me a break” generally is used when you don’t believe something that has happened or been said. We’ve all muttered the expression a lot lately, especially around the 2016 Presidential race. I am going to use it here more literally. I started this blog in late July 2010. This is the 329 th iteration. At an average of 750 words that’s nearly 250,000 words. To compare that’s about three average mystery novels (at 80,000 words each), much less than the Bible (800,000 words) and nowhere near the IRS Code (4 million words). Originally Craig’s Corner was a way to keep me focused during a long stint where I was without work or income. With gainful employment it has become a welcome respite from the day-to-day tasks. I tend to focus on issues that are interesting to me but not necessarily a critical part of what I do day in and day out. My perspective isn’t unique, but I do look at the word with a different lens. I’ve tried hard not to be part of the echo chamber and been...
Read more

Hoping for Grace

I wrote this blog regularly for many years, 330 unique posts. Every Thursday I’d post my thinking for the week. I always strove to offer a perspective that wasn’t in the main discourse on a particular issue. It wasn’t left or right or even center – just looking at something from a different angle. There were some really great dialogues that happened with people who appreciated nuance and having a substantive conversation. I never sought for agreement from readers, just a healthy and respectful debate. The election of Donald J. Trump changed the engagement from polite discourse to flame throwing character assination if somebody disagreed. That wasn’t interesting or productive to me, so the blog no longer served its intended purpose. I return to the format because today because it seems to be a good way to explore an issue that I’ve been long committed to, but handled in a thoughtless way. Recently I made a thoughtless comment on a Facebook post that was undeniably racist, and demean...
Read more

Giving the gift

Image
The holidays are right around the corner. It’s a time of reflection, excitement and no matter one’s religious predilections a there’s a tradition of gift giving. Talking about the holidays before Halloween is usually met with revulsion and resistance. This time it’s different. While we can’t grant everybody’s #1 wish – that the 2016 U.S. Presidential election cycle be over – maybe we can do something close.   Let’s give Donald J. Trump what he’s been talking about. I’m wary of adding to the proliferation of commentary on the Grand Old Party’s nominee. But then maybe there’s something to the Trump complaints. Instead of dismissing everything that comes out of his mouth as made up, perhaps we should be doing is more of what he worries about, not less. The more recent complaints from the real-estate tycoon have to do with media bias. All “the media” does is lie, distort and never gives him fair coverage. This same media generated over a billion dollars of free brand and...
Read more